Panama Crime, Safety & Corruption

Crime, Safety & Corruption

Intro

We, at The Merry Migrant, pride ourselves on transparency, as it relates to living abroad. While we do speak favorably about it, and do encourage it, we also want to be honest about the expectations. There are considerations you must take. These will align with what you deem most important to you. For instance, a younger person may not view healthcare as a priority, whereas an older person, whose health isn't optimal, must consider its availability, cost and quality. Another example, those who've come from big cities, and are used to higher instances of crime, may not be bothered with a global index rating on crime that is slightly higher, when compared to other countries. From personal experiences, it will surprise you how much safer I've felt throughout both my career and while living abroad versus living in the U.S.

It's with this in mind that we are including sections in which we discuss data that is derived from the Global Indexes. It's not meant to paint Panama, or any country in an unfavorable way, as any country has its issues with crime and safety in its various parts. Again, we feel it necessary to share this for our subscribers in order to help you make decisions that benefit you and help you best target your relocation.

Global Indexes are a great way to quantify aspects of a country, sort of a barometer, if you will. It is a break from all of the glossy photos of exotic landscapes, beautiful sunsets, cafes and the likes. It's data driven-and it's not. You may be asking how can this be, we are assigning a numerical rating to a bunch of categories, but the data isn't factual? Here's why, although it is driven by data, the data is subjective.

Many global indexes rely on crowdsourced data or urban samples.

That means they often reflect prices from major cities, not rural or small-town areas, which can be much cheaper or safer.

Currency exchange rates can fluctuate sharply, but local prices don’t always move in sync.
So a temporary change in exchange rates can make one country look cheaper or more expensive than it really is for locals.
What people spend money on differs across countries.
Americans may spend heavily on healthcare or housing; South American countries may spend more on food or transportation-this is where a healthier diet, less processed food can greatly improv your cost of living..
A “basket of goods” used for cost-of-living comparisons may not reflect what you personally buy.
Indexes often mix imported and local goods together.
If you live like a local, you spend far less.
If you prefer imported foods, electronics, or brand names, your actual cost of living may be much higher than the index suggests.
Global indexes assume an average expat or local, but lifestyle matters enormously-if you dine out often versus prepare your own food, your daily cost of living is going to be more.
Most global crime indexes (like those on Numbeo, World Population Review, or Global Peace Index) are not official police statistics — they’re based on survey responses and user perceptions about safety and crime levels.

For example, Numbeo’s Crime Index asks people to rate things like:

How safe they feel walking alone at night
How common they think corruption, theft, or assault are
How much crime they think has increased recently

So it reflects how people feel about crime — not necessarily how many crimes actually happen.

Now that we've laid some groundwork for global indexes, select from the ones below and learn some key information about the countries we recommend, and compare them to your native country and other countries you may be eligible for, based on your initial survey.

The Global Crime Index

The term “Global Crime Index” is often used to refer

to comparative crime-ratings produced by

frameworks like Numbeo. According to Numbeo’s

methodology, each participating respondent gives

answers to questions about how safe they feel,

how common certain crimes are (muggings, theft,

assault), and their perception of changes over the

past few years. These responses are assigned

numerical values (between –2 and +2) then

aggregated and transformed into a standardized

0-100 scale for easier comparison. Because of this

design, the Global Crime Index is essentially a

perception-based indicator, not a direct measure

of crime volume or severity as recorded by police

or courts. It can show how safe people feel in a city

or country, how worried they are about becoming

a victim, and how they perceive the trend of crime,

rather than giving a fully objective count of incidents. While useful for broad comparisons (e.g., ranking countries by perceived safety), this index has key limitations. First, survey-based data may reflect bias: people in high-crime places may under report (or over-report) based on their normalization of risk. Second, the sample is self-selecting (visitors to the site) and may not be statistically representative. Third, variation in definitions of crime, differences in reporting rates, and differences in what “safe” means culturally all affect comparability across countries. In short: the Global Crime Index is a helpful tool for orientation, but one that must be interpreted with caution and supplemented by objective crime statistics and local context. You also must remember, both the most advanced countries have certain neighborhood and areas that you'd be forewarned

not to venture into. No country is absolutely safe and free of crime. Some places types of crimes are common and almost predictable, such as pick-pocketing, and other forms of petty theft, while surprisingly, in some developed nations, mass public shootings take place, attempted assassination of elected officials, etc.

The Global Crime Index& Inaccuracy

Since the date is largely perception based, it can be misinterpreted. You must take this into consideration when you look at each country. While it is very useful, it must be weighed against the opinion of others.

How it can be skewed:

Perception vs Reality: The index often relies on surveys rather than strictly reported crime rates. This means media coverage, tourism reports, or social buzz can exaggerate or mask issues.
Underreporting: In some countries, people are less likely to report crimes due to mistrust in law enforcement or lack of legal access. This leads to artificially low crime data.
Data Gap Between Regions: Some areas (like capital cities) may have higher crime rates that inflate a national rating, even if rural or suburban areas are much safer.

What the Safety Index Measures

The Safety Index is a numerical score used to indicate how safe a country or city is perceived to be, usually on a

scale from 0 to 100. It’s often paired with the Crime Index, which measures the opposite — the higher the crime

index, the lower the safety index, and vice versa.
The Safety Index considers both actual crime statistics (like thefts, assaults, and homicides) and public

perceptions of safety (how secure people feel walking alone, or how common they think corruption is). The data

often come from official government sources, police reports, victimization surveys, and user-contributed surveys.

How It’s Calculated

The Safety Index is typically derived from several indicators that reflect both violent and non-violent crime.

Factors often included are:

Perceived safety when walking alone (day and night)
Concerns about property crimes (theft, burglary, vandalism)
Concerns about violent crimes (assault, robbery, sexual violence)
Corruption and bribery levels
Law enforcement effectiveness and public trust in police

How to Interpret It

A higher Safety Index score means residents and visitors generally feel secure and face fewer risks from crime. A

lower score suggests a greater perception (or reality) of danger, corruption, or weak law enforcement. However,

it’s important to understand that the index reflects both data and perception — sometimes people feel unsafe

even when crime is statistically low, or vice versa. For example, developed countries like Japan, Switzerland, and

Iceland typically score above 80, showing very high safety. In contrast, countries with ongoing instability or higher

crime rates, like Venezuela or South Africa, might score below 30.

Crime in Panama

Current Perception & Overview

According to Numbeo’s country-level data for Panama, the Crime Index is about 42.70 (on a 0-100 scale) and the Safety Index about 57.30. On their classification scale, this places Panama in the “Low to Moderate” perceived crime range (20.01-40 = Low, 40.01-60 = Moderate) for overall crime. For Panama City specifically, the Crime Index is around 47.12, with a Safety Index of 52.88.

What this suggests: Many respondents feel some level of risk or worry (especially at night or in certain neighborhoods), but Panama is not perceived as among the most dangerous countries. For example, walking during daylight in Panama is rated as “High” in safety (76.66 out of 100) but walking alone at night drops to “Moderate” (53.21).

Objective Crime Data & Trends

Looking beyond perceptions, some concrete data for Panama show areas of concern:

The country had a homicide rate of approximately 12.9 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2024.
In a recent year, there were around 17,000 thefts reported, and over 21,000 cases of domestic violence.
There is a clear uptick: for example, in 2024 there were 581 homicides (up 4.4 % from 2023), with the provinces of Panamá and Colón accounting for about 75 % of those cases.
Organized crime is a major factor: the country is identified as having a high incidence of transnational organized crime (money-laundering, arms and drug trafficking) owing in part to its strategic position.

Implications for Residents & Expats

For someone considering living or travelling in Panama, the picture is mixed but manageable:

Many parts of the country (especially tourist and expat-friendly zones) are reasonably safe if one uses standard precautions (avoid isolated areas at night, keep valuables secure).
However, certain regions (especially the province of Colón) and certain types of crime (theft, organized crime) present elevated risk. For example, pickpocketing and robberies are cited as common in busy transit zones or less-monitored neighborhoods.
Because the homicide rate and other serious crimes are above some global averages, one should not assume Panama offers the same safety level as low-crime countries. Instead it sits somewhere in a “moderate risk” bracket—safe in many respects, but with risks that must be managed consciously.

High-risk regions & neighborhoods

Colón Province (Caribbean coast)

This province is repeatedly cited as one of the most dangerous in Panama. For example, in 2024 there were 581 homicides nationally, and “75% of homicides are recorded in the provinces of Panama (province) and Colón.”

A gang-mapping study found the largest concentration of gangs in Panama’s main province, Colón and Chiriquí.

Advice for expats/travelers: Generally “avoid non-essential visits” to Colón, especially at night and in less familiar areas.

Darién Province

This border region is known for serious organized crime and is flagged as high-risk by multiple sources.

Very remote, less developed infrastructure, and law enforcement is weaker — which elevates risk.

Panama City (Certain neighborhoods, Capital / Metro)

Within Panama City, the crime risk varies widely. Some locales are upscale and safe; others are known for gang presence, higher violence or theft.

For example: neighborhoods like El Chorrillo, Curundú, San Miguelito are cited for elevated crime.

Vehicular thefts, residential break-ins and robberies are more common in the metropolitan zone.

Safer / expat-friendly zones

Boquete (Chiriquí Province, highlands)

This mountain town is frequently mentioned as one of the safest areas in Panama for expats, with “consistently low crime rates”.

Good choice if you prefer a calmer lifestyle, smaller community and are willing to trade off big-city amenities.

Coronado (Beach town, west of Panama City)

A popular coastal choice for retirees & expats; has a relatively “high safety index” in comparison to high-risk zones.

Being outside the dense urban core helps — fewer of the worst neighborhood problems seen inside the capital.

Panama City-upscale neighborhoods, Punta Pacífica, Costa del Este, Clayton

These areas are favored by foreign residents, embassy staff, business people — they tend to have stronger security, gated communities, good infrastructure.

From the data: many expats feel safe living in these areas, as long as standard precautions are followed. Expat Exchange

Key crime types & practical precautions

Most common crimes

Petty theft (pick-pocketing, bag-snatching, theft from vehicles) is the most frequent issue, especially in crowded tourist areas or transit hubs.

Residential burglaries and vehicle thefts are identified as rising in urban zones. For example: vehicle thefts in Panama City rose ~11% in 2024, with clusters in areas like “Panama East, Betania”.

Organized / gang-related violence is more localized (in high-risk zones listed above) and less likely to affect expats if living in safer districts.

Practical safety recommendations

Choose your neighborhood carefully: Reside in one of the safer zones (see above) rather than assuming “the city is safe everywhere”.
Be vigilant with valuables: Avoid flashing expensive gear in public, don’t leave items visible in parked vehicles, use secure parking when possible.
Use safe transport: In higher-risk areas avoid using non-reputable taxis at night; prefer ride-hailing or trusted drivers.
Know the local “red zones”: Even in generally safe areas, there may be blocks or streets that have elevated risk. Locals or expat-communities can help identify them.
Night time and remote travel: Avoid walking alone in poorly lit or unfamiliar neighborhoods at night. If traveling outside major zones (especially border or jungle areas like Darién), get current advice and perhaps local escort

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is a global ranking that measures how corrupt a country’s public sector is perceived to be. It looks at how much public officials and politicians are seen as abusing their power for private gain. The CPI scores countries on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates a highly corrupt perception and 100 indicates a very clean public sector. Countries are also ranked relative to each other based on their score.

The CPI is perception‑based rather than measuring every act of corruption directly. It relies on expert assessments and surveys of business leaders about how corruption affects governance, procurement, and enforcement. The methodology combines multiple sources, scales them to a standard score, and aggregates the results. This allows comparisons across countries, even though definitions, survey populations, and cultural perceptions of corruption can differ.

The index is widely used to indicate governance quality and risk for investors, expats, and policy makers. A higher score signals lower perceived corruption and generally stronger rule of law, while a lower score indicates higher perceived corruption and potential challenges such as bribery, misuse of public funds, and weak enforcement.

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) measures how corrupt a country’s public sector is perceived to be, focusing on behaviors such as bribery, misuse of public funds, favoritism in government contracts, and abuse of power by officials. It captures both petty corruption (small bribes and daily abuses of authority) and grand corruption (large-scale embezzlement or political influence). The CPI also reflects systemic corruption, where weak institutions and lack of accountability allow misconduct to persist. It does not measure private-sector or moral corruption directly, but instead relies on expert and business surveys to gauge the overall perception of how widespread and serious corruption is within a country’s government and institutions.

Panama’s Corruption Profile

Panama’s CPI score is currently around 33 out of 100, placing it in the lower range globally and below the regional average. This suggests a significant perception that corruption is common in the public sector. While laws exist to fight corruption, enforcement and oversight are seen as weak, and public trust in government institutions is relatively low.

Practical implications for living, investing, or doing business in Panama include the need for caution. Corruption risks such as bribery, non-transparent procurement, or bureaucratic inefficiencies are present. Certain institutions, like political parties, legislators, and prosecutors, are often perceived as more prone to corrupt practices. While some progress has been reported in specific areas, the overall perception of corruption remains a notable concern.

For anyone considering Panama, the CPI highlights the importance of due diligence, choosing trusted partners, and understanding local governance dynamics. Being aware of these risks helps individuals and businesses navigate the country more safely and effectively.

Panama’s relatively low CPI score is tied to a combination of historical patterns, systemic issues, and high-profile incidents that have shaped public perception. Here’s a summary:

Historical corruption patterns

Panama has long struggled with weak institutional oversight, limited transparency, and inconsistent enforcement of anti-corruption laws. Political parties, government officials, and public agencies are often perceived as operating with impunity, which has contributed to a persistent sense of corruption. Frequent changes in administration without significant institutional reform have reinforced this perception.

High-profile scandals

Several incidents have reinforced the perception of corruption:

Panama Papers (2016): The leak of 11.5 million documents exposed the use of Panama-based law firms and offshore structures by politicians, business leaders, and celebrities worldwide to hide wealth and avoid taxes. This incident made Panama synonymous with financial secrecy and offshore schemes, severely affecting international perceptions.
Government procurement and embezzlement cases: Over the years, reports of mismanagement and misappropriation of public funds, particularly in infrastructure projects and social programs, have regularly emerged. These cases, often involving high-ranking officials, reinforce the idea that corruption is systemic.
Judicial and law enforcement weaknesses: Investigations into corruption are sometimes slow or inconclusive, and public trust in courts and prosecutors remains low. This creates the impression that corrupt actors can avoid accountability.

Institutional and structural issues

Limited transparency in political financing and lobbying.
Gaps in anti-corruption enforcement and oversight agencies.
Vulnerability to organized crime and money laundering due to Panama’s strategic location and financial sector.

Bottom line: Panama’s CPI score reflects not only individual incidents but a broader structural and historical pattern of weak governance, lack of accountability, and high-profile scandals like the Panama Papers. These factors together shape both domestic and international perceptions of corruption in the country.

Despite what has happened in times past, Panama clearly has improved and their CPI Index rating indicates so. With that, corruption should not be considered a major determining factor for anyone wanting to consider Panama as their new home.

Back to Panama Home